ED vs. O-Ring Face Seal Fittings: How to Select the Best Hydraulic Connection
Publish Time: 2025-10-08 Origin: Site
The Core Difference: How They Seal
1. O-Ring Face Seal (ORFS) Fittings: Elastic Sealing
Key Advantage: The seal is created by the elastic deformation of the O-ring, which compensates for surface imperfections and vibrations. The metal-to-metal contact of the flanges provides mechanical strength, while the O-ring handles the sealing.
2. ED (Bite-Type) Fittings: Metal-to-Metal Sealing
Key Advantage: The front spherical surface of the ferrule bites into the fitting's 24° cone, creating a rigid metal-to-metal seal. Simultaneously, the ferrule's cutting edges bite into the tube wall to provide grip and prevent pull-out.
Head-to-Head Comparison Chart
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to Choose: Application-Based Recommendations
Choose O-Ring Face Seal (ORFS) Fittings If:
Your equipment operates in high-vibration environments (e.g., mobile hydraulics, construction, agricultural, and mining machinery). You need to frequently disconnect and reconnect lines for maintenance or configuration changes. Ease and speed of assembly are priorities, and installer skill levels may vary. Your system experiences significant pressure surges. Leak-free reliability is the non-negotiable top priority for most standard industrial applications.
Choose ED (Bite-Type) Fittings If:
Your system uses fluids incompatible with common elastomers, such as phosphate ester-based (Skydrol) hydraulic fluids. You are operating in extreme temperature environments that exceed the limits of high-temperature O-rings. You are working within an existing system or industry standard (e.g., certain aerospace or legacy industrial systems) that specifies their use. Space constraints are extreme, and the more compact design of an ED fitting is necessary.